How Does the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile GPU Compare to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980mx and Vega 64?

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile GPU is a power-efficient and scalable graphics processor designed specifically for mobile devices. It is capable of excellent performance and power efficiency, and was announced a long time ago. This article will look at how it compares to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 and Vega 64 in non-gaming benchmarks.

Non-gaming benchmark performance

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile graphics card features a 495mm2 die with 12,500 million transistors. It has 3584 shading units and 224 texture mapping units. It also includes 8 GB of HBM2 memory. Its clock frequency is 1138MHz.

The card also features 120W of power consumption. It also features a number of video connectors and outputs, including HDMI and VGA. It also supports next-generation graphics. Although no specific benchmarks are available for this mobile GPU, general performance parameters are available, including clock speed, number of shaders, and memory type.

As for gaming performance, the RX Vega 56 Mobile performs similarly to the NVIDIA GTX 1070. While the latter has more shaders and 28 CUs, the former is slightly more powerful. As a result, the two GPUs trade blows in many games.

While the GeForce GTX 1070 and RX Vega 56 are similar in terms of raw performance and price, they have different features. The RX Vega 56 is the cut-down version of the Vega 64. It is more comparable to the GTX 1080 and GTX 1070, but has less compute units and stream processors. The smaller size makes it more affordable than the GTX 1080.

AMD’s RX Vega 56 mobile graphics card is a little behind the GTX 1080 in terms of gaming benchmark performance. For those with 1440p monitors, the RX Vega 56 beats the GTX 1080 Ti, which can only play games in 4K/60fps.

The Vega 56 also holds its boost speeds fairly consistently, although it has a wild power draw. The Vega 64, on the other hand, would have better performance if it had a 240mm radiator. The Vega 56’s performance varies between 1,474MHz and 1,312MHz. However, the Vega 64 tends to stick around 1,536MHz.

If you’re a budget-conscious gamer, the Radeon RX Vega 56 is a solid option. It’s more powerful than the RX 580, and has an improved price to performance ratio. It’s also better for graphics-intensive games, including those that favor GeForce hardware.

The Radeon RX Vega 56 looks much like the RX Vega 64, but the difference is in its innards. The RX Vega 56 uses space-saving HBM2 memory and has fewer texture units than the Radeon RX Vega 64. Both cards use 8GB of HBM2 memory, but the memory clock is significantly lower at 800MHz.

The new graphics card comes with 8GB of onboard HBM2 memory and a high-bandwidth cache controller that keeps track of GPU memory usage. When unused bits are transferred to system memory, the GPU uses the new high-bandwidth cache.

Power consumption is another factor that is important to consider. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56’s power consumption is higher than the GTX 1070’s. It uses up to 210W of power during its peak performance and is also capable of using up to 150W in idle mode. It also requires quite a lot of juice when using Turbo mode.

Vega 10 XT vs Vega 64

AMD Vega 64 and AMD RX Vega 56 mobile graphics cards are almost identical in price and performance. Both have dual 8-pin PCIe connectors. The difference in the two graphics cards is mainly in their power requirements. The Vega 64 is more powerful than its counterpart, and is priced around $700. Both are designed for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and are compatible with FreeSync monitors.

The Vega 56 is slightly better than the GTX 1070 in 1080p games, and it generates less heat than its counterpart. If you’re not looking to play ultra-high-definition games, the Vega 56 is the better choice.

Despite their modest performance in games, both cards are capable of delivering smooth gameplay. In Civilization VI, for example, AMD’s card beats the equivalent GeForce card on High settings. This card is also faster than the GTX 1080 on High settings, although the GTX 1080 Ti only reaches 4K/60fps.

At launch, few standalone Vega 64 cards were available. The vast majority of the stock was used in Radeon Packs. As a result, the stand-alone model quickly sold out. Within hours, prices rose $100 or more at retail.

AMD Vega 64 features a new high-bandwidth memory architecture. This architecture was designed to compete with the GTX 1080 and GTX 1070. However, in most games, AMD cards fall behind Nvidia GPUs. The new architecture allows AMD cards to compete with NVIDIA’s latest DirectX 12 and Vulkan APIs.

The AMD RX Vega 64 is slightly faster, but the Vega 56 has a lower boost clock. The Vega 64 has a higher base clock than the Vega FE air-cooled card. AMD’s RX Vega 64 is likely to have a 7-8% performance advantage. AMD is offering a liquid-cooled version for $700.

The RX Vega 64 has a double frame buffer and HBM2 memory that will make it more competitive with the GeForce GTX 1080. The RX Vega 56 has the same memory and boost clock speed as the GTX 1070, but offers less power than the GTX 1080. AMD is banking on an ecosystem of supported games and FreeSync-equipped curved monitors.

AMD says it plans to bring a 7nm version of its Vega architecture to the market later this year. The 7nm Vega architecture will initially be intended for machine learning applications and may eventually make its way into consumer products. Its new Navi GPU, meanwhile, is expected to be launched in Q1 of next year.

AMD’s RX Vega 64 is available in two models, with the first being a reference model that looks similar to the Polaris graphics card. It has a brushed aluminum exterior, and is intended for initial buyers. The other is a mini ITX version. It’s also sold with a $100 discount, which gets you a free monitor and a CPU.

AMD says the Vega 64 is better than its predecessor. The 64 has more stream processors and a higher core frequency. It is liquid-cooled and requires just a single 8-pin power connector. It has three DisplayPorts and one HDMI port.

Vega 8 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile are two videocards with similar specifications. However, the Vega architecture provides faster graphics performance. The AMD card boasts 512 shading units while the GeForce card has 1024 units with a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz. Both graphics cards have a cache memory of 16 MB.

The GTX 1650 is an excellent choice for gamers, because it can handle modern games without a memory bottleneck. Unlike the Vega 8 mobile, the GTX 1650 is discrete. Its 4GB of video memory and its 240 MB of RAM will let you play a variety of games smoothly and at a high framerate.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Cezanne and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile TU117 are two mobile graphics cards. The Vega 8 is better in performance and efficiency, but the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has the most memory and uses 12% more energy.

When comparing the two graphics cards, it is important to note that both have their advantages and disadvantages. For instance, the GTX 1650 is capable of playing many modern games, though the user will need to reduce the settings to achieve higher frame rates. The GeForce GTX 1650 is also a great choice for gamers on a budget, as its power requirements are low. Furthermore, it has excellent cooling, a feature that most competitors lack.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button